A recognizable car.
A repeatable process.

The work behind the image

The first version
wasn’t enough.

The car had to be recognizable from every useful view. That meant changing the way we worked, not just adding more detail.

The early geometry did not pass visual review. The build changed methods: compare against references, isolate disputed surfaces and test paint placement with deliberately unnatural colors. Saved scripts and checkpoints made each correction inspectable.

Seven chapters

Follow the decisions.

Read from the beginning, or open the part of the process you want to inspect.

01

A specific car. A demanding brief.

Reconstructing the Ferrari SF-26, Charles Leclerc’s number 16, from public references. Documenting the build and private format checks through images.

02

A clean mesh can still be the wrong shape.

Measurements protected the work. Clay renders and reference comparisons decided whether the visible form had improved.

03

Paint needs a surface and a direction.

The livery became a system of editable artwork, explicit receiving surfaces and diagnostic views.

04

The critic had to challenge the premise.

Some fixes were small. Others began by admitting that the representation being protected was wrong.

05

Build. Review. Verify.

Separate construction from criticism, preserve the experiments and verify the saved result.

06

Preserve the work across formats.

Private delivery tests checked the model beyond Blender. This case study shares the rendered evidence, not the model files.

07

The car, in light.

Ten 4K studio views, from the complete silhouette to the smallest assemblies, plus matching clay and wireframe studies.